Architect vs. Design-Build: What to Know Before You Choose a Custom Home Team
When planning a custom home or major remodel, one of the first questions you will face is who will design my house? Some clients are a better fit for the Design-Build model, while others prefer the results of an Architect led design.
At Studio Kamppari, we focus on design first, and then collaborate with the right builder to bring those designs to life. Because we are not tied to any one construction company or product line, our clients have design flexibility, access to a wide range of high quality materials, and an active advocate during construction.
Let’s look at how these two models compare, so you can choose the path that’s right for your project.
Option 1: Design-Build
A single company handles both the design and the construction.
Pros:
Single point of contact — Less coordination on your part.
Faster timelines — Design and construction phases can overlap.
Predictable pricing — Easier to get early ballpark estimates.
Cons:
Limited design exploration — Most design-build firms focus on efficiency, not unique vision.
You may not own your design — Plans are often not transferable to another builder.
Construction-led thinking — Design often follows conventional building practices, rather than custom solutions.
Best for:
Homeowners with a tight timeline and simple program.
Projects where efficiency matters more than customization.
Clients who prioritize convenience over design optimization.
Option 2: Architect & Builder (the Studio Kamppari model)
You work with an architect to develop a design first, then hire a builder to construct it.
Pros:
Custom design: Your home is fully bespoke — tailored to your lifestyle, priorities, and the unique characteristics of your site.
Creative problem-solving: Because your architect isn’t limited by a single builder’s methods or materials, the design can focus on what’s best—not just what’s easiest, cheapest to build or most common. At Studio Kamppari, this means we can accommodate more challenging sites, we think long-term and recommend durable, low maintenance materials, and we create spaces unique to you.
Checks and balances: Architect and builder can each bring insights to the table—there’s less “this is how we’ve always done it” and more shared discovery for the best practice details that make high quality homes.
Cons:
More upfront time: A thoughtful design process takes time and collaboration.
Separate contracts: You will manage more relationships.
Budget clarity comes later: Exact construction pricing isn’t available until the design is complete and bids are in. At Studio Kamppari, our designs are guided by historical cost ranges and a builder can provide detailed estimates during the design process through Pre-Construction Services.
Best for:
Homeowners who want a high-quality, thoughtful, site-specific custom home.
Projects that value good design and call for creative, better than average solutions.
Clients who are investing in a long-term home—not just a building.
Why It Matters for Scandinavian-Inspired Design
At Studio Kamppari, we specialize in homes rooted in Scandinavian values—practical, full of natural light, and well protected from the elements. These homes aren't off-the-shelf. They rely on intentional design, site-specific thinking, and a clear architectural vision.
A design-build approach can sometimes flatten those ideas into a version that fits the builder’s usual routine and bottom line. With an independent architect and the right builder, you can create something truly personal, very livable, and built to last.
Still Not Sure Which Path is Right for You?
Every project is different. We’re happy to help you explore your options. Reach out to start the conversation.